Fukushima, UFOs, and the Unanswered Questions: Examining the Claims

10 Documented UFO (UAP) Cases That Continue to Spark Questions

For decades, reports of unidentified flying objects have fascinated the public. In recent years, the topic has received renewed attention because government agencies, military personnel, and scientific organizations have openly acknowledged that some sightings remain unidentified.

The cases below are not presented as proof of extraterrestrial activity. They are documented incidents involving military reports, government investigations, witness testimony, or publicly released data that continue to generate discussion.

1. The 2004 USS Nimitz “Tic Tac” Encounter

In 2004, Navy pilots from the USS Nimitz carrier group reported encountering an unusual object off the coast of California.

The incident became one of the most famous modern UAP cases after Navy video footage was officially released and acknowledged by the Department of Defense.

Sources:

• U.S. Department of Defense/UAP materials

• Congressional UAP hearings and released Navy footage

2. The 2015 Navy “Gimbal” and “GoFast” Videos

Navy pilots recorded several unidentified objects during training exercises in 2015.

The videos were later released publicly and became part of official UAP discussions. Some cases have received conventional explanations, while others remain debated due to limited available data.

Sources:

• Pentagon All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) case files

• U.S. Navy-released footage

3. The Roswell Incident (1947)

In 1947, debris was recovered near Roswell, New Mexico, after reports of a strange object crash.

The U.S. military first announced recovery of a “flying disc,” then later stated the debris was connected to a classified balloon project known as Project Mogul.

The incident remains one of the most famous UFO cases in history because of disagreements over the official explanation and witness accounts.

Sources:

• U.S. Air Force, The Roswell Report: Case Closed

4. The 1967 Shag Harbour Incident

Residents of Shag Harbour, Nova Scotia, reported seeing a glowing object enter the water in 1967.

Canadian authorities investigated reports of the event, including searches connected to the sighting. No universally accepted explanation has been established.

Sources:

• Canadian government archival materials

• Historical investigations of the Shag Harbour case

5. The 1966 Westall School Sighting

In Australia, students and teachers at Westall High School reported seeing an unusual object near the school.

The case remains controversial because of the number of witnesses involved and the different explanations offered over the years.

Sources:

• Australian historical investigations

• Witness interviews and archival research

6. The 1976 Tehran UFO Incident

In 1976, Iranian Air Force pilots reported encountering an unusual object over Tehran.

The incident became notable because it involved military pilots and official reporting. Explanations and interpretations of the event remain debated.

Sources:

• U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency documents

• Historical UFO case research

7. The 1980 Rendlesham Forest Incident

In December 1980, U.S. military personnel stationed at RAF Woodbridge in England reported seeing unusual lights and investigating activity near the base.

The event became known as “Britain’s Roswell” and remains one of the most discussed military UFO cases.

Sources:

• United Kingdom Ministry of Defence records

• Witness statements from former military personnel

8. The 1994 Ariel School Incident

In Zimbabwe, dozens of students reported seeing an unusual object and possible beings near their school.

The case remains notable because of the number of witnesses and the consistency of some accounts over time.

Sources:

• Witness interviews

• Investigative documentaries and research archives

9. The 2006 Chicago O’Hare Airport Sighting

In 2006, several airport employees and pilots reported seeing a disc-shaped object above Chicago O’Hare International Airport.

The Federal Aviation Administration investigated the report, although no official explanation involving an unusual craft was confirmed.

Sources:

• FAA statements

• Aviation news reporting archives

10. Modern Government Study of UAP

Today, UAP research is no longer limited to private investigators. NASA conducted an independent study examining how scientific methods could improve the collection and analysis of UAP data. NASA noted that the limited number of high-quality observations makes firm conclusions difficult, while emphasizing the value of better data collection.

The Pentagon’s All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) continues reviewing UAP reports and publishing case information.

Final Thoughts

The UFO/UAP subject remains one of the most interesting areas where science, history, aviation, and human curiosity overlap.

Some sightings eventually receive ordinary explanations. Others remain unresolved because of limited information.

The best approach is the same one used in any historical investigation: examine the evidence, consider multiple possibilities, and separate what is known from what is still unknown.

Additional Sources

• NASA UAP Independent Study Report

• Pentagon AARO UAP Case Archive

• U.S. Air Force Roswell Report

10 Documented Facts About 9/11 That Continue to Spark Questions

September 11, 2001 changed the world forever. The basic timeline of the attacks is well documented, but many details surrounding that day continue to be studied, debated, and investigated.

The following are 10 documented facts about 9/11 that are worth knowing. These facts do not automatically prove any specific explanation, but they are important pieces of history that have led many people to ask questions.

1. U.S. Intelligence Agencies Had Prior Warnings About Possible Terrorist Activity

Before 9/11, multiple intelligence agencies had information indicating that al-Qaeda posed a threat to U.S. interests.

The 9/11 Commission later described failures involving intelligence collection, communication, and the inability to connect pieces of information that existed before the attacks.

2. Four Commercial Airplanes Were Hijacked

On September 11, four passenger aircraft were hijacked.

American Airlines Flight 11 and United Airlines Flight 175 struck the World Trade Center towers. American Airlines Flight 77 struck the Pentagon. United Airlines Flight 93 crashed in Pennsylvania after passengers attempted to retake control of the aircraft.

3. World Trade Center Building 7 Collapsed Later That Day

World Trade Center Building 7, a 47-story building near the Twin Towers, collapsed at approximately 5:20 p.m. on September 11.

Unlike the Twin Towers, it was not struck by an airplane. Its collapse became one of the most discussed aspects of the day. NIST conducted a lengthy investigation and concluded that fires and structural failures caused the collapse.

4. The Attacks Exposed Major Security and Intelligence Failures

After 9/11, investigations found failures involving airport security, intelligence sharing, emergency response, and communication between government agencies.

The 9/11 Commission described these failures as problems involving “imagination, policy, capabilities, and management.”

5. Some Intelligence Information Was Not Fully Connected Before the Attacks

One of the major questions after 9/11 was how multiple agencies could have pieces of information but still fail to prevent the attack.

The official investigations focused heavily on problems with coordination and information sharing.

6. Unusual Financial Activity Before 9/11 Was Investigated

In the days before the attacks, investigators examined unusual trading activity involving airline-related stocks.

The issue received significant public attention, and investigations examined whether any trades were connected to advance knowledge. Authorities did not establish that the trades were placed by individuals with prior knowledge of the attacks.

7. The Hijackers Exploited Weaknesses in Aviation Security

Before 9/11, cockpit security and airport screening procedures were much different than they are today.

The attacks led to major changes in aviation security worldwide.

8. 9/11 Changed U.S. Foreign Policy for Decades

Following the attacks, the United States launched military operations in Afghanistan and later invaded Iraq.

The political and military consequences of 9/11 remain some of the most debated issues of the modern era.

9. Evidence and Documents From 9/11 Have Continued to Be Released

Over the years, additional documents, testimony, and intelligence records have become public.

The continued release and review of information has kept many aspects of 9/11 under examination.

10. Historical Events Require Continued Examination

Major events are often studied for decades. Asking questions, reviewing evidence, and comparing different explanations are normal parts of understanding history.

The most productive discussions happen when people separate confirmed facts from interpretations and remain willing to examine evidence carefully.

Sources for Further Reading

• The 9/11 Commission Report

• NIST World Trade Center Investigation Reports

• Government investigations into intelligence failures before September 11, 2001

• Publicly released documents related to 9/11 investigations

Before EVP Had a Name: A Historically Significant Early Account of Recorded Voice Phenomena

An archival transcription and research commentary from JM Talboo of DebunkingDeath.blogspot.com

The following article is preserved as part of an effort to document the history of paranormal research and the early investigations that would later become associated with Electronic Voice Phenomena (EVP).

Published decades before EVP became a widely recognized term, this account describes the experiments of Friedrich Jürgenson and the unusual recordings that attracted attention from researchers, broadcasters, and members of the public. Regardless of how one interprets the source of these recordings, the article represents an important historical document in the development of recorded-voice research.

The original article is presented here through selected excerpts and historical discussion, with additional commentary from a modern researcher examining the continuing evolution of EVP investigation.

Researcher's Commentary

One of the most interesting aspects of this account is that it captures a moment before EVP had fully developed into the field known today. The investigators were still trying to understand what they were hearing, what methods should be used, and what possible explanations existed.

The article’s description of unusual voice qualities, apparent responses, and references to the recording apparatus are themes that continue to appear in modern discussions of EVP.

The statement that this was “only the beginning” is historically interesting. Since the publication of this account, recording technology has changed dramatically, and researchers have continued experimenting with new methods for investigating possible communication phenomena.

A continuing question in this field is not only whether unusual recordings exist, but also what they represent. If one approaches these reports from a survival-of-consciousness perspective, possibilities include complete continuation of personality, fragments of memory or identity, or some other form of preserved consciousness. Similar questions arise in discussions of different types of reported hauntings, including the distinction between intelligent and residual phenomena.

The value of preserving historical material like this is that it allows future researchers to examine how these ideas developed over time and compare early reports with modern investigations.

Weise states, absolutely, the voices came in just between his question and Jurgenson's answer, all but eliminating the possibility of pre-recording.

Many of Jurgenson's friends, newspapermen, Swedish and foreign parapsychologists, have heard the tapes and all share Weise's amazement.

"And no one has any explanation to give," Jurgenson says. "To fake such transmissions for four years would be impossible. Imagine engaging choirs from different countries for transmissions in a blended language and with personal greetings."

Stensson says:

"Interesting and perplexing. One hears voices and choirs that could not possibly be part of the usual radio transmission, and the voices are definitely not part of normal interference.

"Sometimes it's difficult to catch the words, and there's always the question of interpretation.

"But on the other hand, some of the ghostly voices can be heard very clearly. There is no doubt that they are on the tape.

"Our present radio technique has no reasonable explanation for this phenomena. There is no reason to expect falsification.

"One might find it a little strange, however, that the departed use such measures. For example, why use an aria out of Rigoletto to send messages to Jurgenson in the city of Molnbo in Sweden?"

One of the four recordings which Stensson says it would be impossible to fake was made through Jurgenson's radio of a BBC broadcast of Handel's Messiah. Voices interrupt in the middle of the Hallelujah Chorus to say:

"We are not dead, we live, we live, contact, contact, contact in the middle of the earth."

If such an interpretation were technically possible, and Stensson says it isn't, it would require a full symphony orchestra and choir.

Jurgenson recognizes some of the voices as belonging to friends or recent historical figures. A total of 139 voices have been identified. Nearly double that number have preferred to remain anonymous.

There are no voices of people who died before the 19th century. The oldest voice is that of Bismarck, who states he is impatient for reincarnation.

According to the information relayed by these voices, fellowship on the other side is easy and pleasant. There appears to be a gentleman's agreement among the spirits not to discuss politics. They are tenderhearted, friendly, witty, and forgiving of earthly foibles.

Hitler, for example, is said to associate with a victim of a Nazi concentration camp. He has identified himself on one of the tapes with the words:

"Ich bin Adolf Hitler,"

and seems to be continuously ashamed of his earthly misdeeds.

He states:

"If one does not want to stink on the earth and stand in the middle of time and swear recompense, then he must take all the guilt on himself, becoming the father of his time."

Nevertheless, Hitler claims he was a victim of circumstances, that his actions were the result of an unbelievable dementia brought about by syphilis.

A woman believed to be Eva Braun sings in a nervous, passionate voice about her wedding and death. She sang about her death and all about the dead in a voice "dreary in its monotony," according to one listener.

"It is as if the dead were mature souls but naive as children," Jurgenson says. "Sometimes people don't know they have died. They sleep a long time and must be awakened by others. This happens to people who die quickly, as in auto accidents."

Caryl Chessman, however, was well prepared.

"Now I am really dead. I'm flying, I'm flying," he says on one of the tapes.

Rai Boris Sacharow.

A dead friend of Jurgenson says, "Oh, so cold," in Swedish. Although the man did not speak Swedish during his lifetime, he's full of Swedish phrases now.

One spirit is interested in the Jurgenson family poodle, Carino.

Another told Mrs. Jurgenson's, a Stockholm dentist, to take a taxi to work rather than the risky family car.

(Anybody who has tried driving among the numerous Swedish Stirling Mosses will understand why!)

Another spirit offered a bit of scientific information.

"On Venus, there is no life," the voice said.

Jurgenson has some recordings of spirits who wail and scream hysterically, apparently because they suffer from the nightmare that they are still alive and living on Earth.

But for the most part, the voices are characterized by a cheerful and happy imbecility.

Intelligence seems to deteriorate rapidly after death.

Here is the final section:

Writing

What of the man the dead have chosen to talk with?

Jurgenson came to Sweden in 1943 and is now a citizen of his adopted country. For two years he was an opera singer, but was forced to retire by a sinus condition.

He speaks many languages, including Hebrew, German, English, French, Italian, and Yiddish, as well as Russian and Swedish.

The paintings which decorate the walls of his home in suburban Molnbo bear witness to a talent cultivated in a post-academic style.

He used to earn between three and six thousand Swedish crowns for a portrait, but lately he has not been painting at all.

Jurgenson believes the spirits have chosen to contact him because of his knowledge of languages. Another reason may be his appreciation and sensitivity to music. Another reason is perhaps his patience.

Jurgenson, a shy, quiet man, says he is especially glad a Swede was chosen to contact the spirits in the other world. Sweden, he points out, is a land with a good reputation among the dead. It is known for its peaceful, positive, helpful, and hospitable people.

He sees himself as sort of a guinea pig.

"What has happened," he says, "is only the beginning, the beginning of a communications network between the living and the dead."

He's also not afraid of skepticism. He points out that Thomas Edison tried to build a machine to contact the dead, and so did Marconi. He talks of Rhine's experiments in extrasensory perception.

Weise says:

"I know him as a good fellow. It would be terrible if he had fooled us. He has received so many letters from people who have lost someone and who want to make contact."

Weise says he regarded Jurgenson as a "skeptic" in matters of religion.

"It is on a purely technical basis that he talks about what has happened. There is another world. People are in it, and that's all there is to it."

Jurgenson hopes to do a television program in Sweden with Weise and his entire family, all of whom believe in the voices.

ENDLESS WAR: Saudi Arabia Preps Yemen Assault + US-Israel Plot Iran Land Blockade (Rachel Blevins)

ENDLESS WAR: Saudi Arabia Preps Yemen Assault + US-Israel Plot Iran Land Blockade (Rachel Blevins)

Reports say Saudi Arabia is preparing a “sea and possible land” assault on Yemen, as it enters another round of war with Ansar Allah. And Netanyahu’s visit to the White House has sparked new U.S. plans to further the war on Iran. In other words, the regional war isn’t ending anytime soon…



If Saudi Arabia attacks Yemen then Yemen will likely destroy their power grid and oil infrastructure. Iran may also make such an attack if Yemen does not. If the US and Israel continue to attack Iran this sort of retaliation will come in any event. Once the power goes out in Saudi Arabia that country will struggle to operate as a nation. Whatever happens there will be no flows of oil coming out of the region in the near future. 

The proposed ideas coming from the US-Israeli side to advance the war are not well grounded to say the least. Their best course of action is to capitulate to Iranian demands. 

[Posted at the SpookyWeather2 blog, August 2, 2026.]

Censorship Should Not Exist!

This is Debunkers blog contributor, Steve Weather's, site. His original site was censored and tens of thousands of posts were lost. He is Australian and doesn't have free speech and neither will we if we don't fight back. 

SpookyWeather2.blogspot.com 

SELECT NEWS AND SPECIAL INTEREST STORIES FROM THE ALTERNATIVE MEDIA (Video Hub). COVERING THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUES APPEARING IN OUR TWILIGHT ZONE WORLD.

Transcript of World Renowned Oncologist Connects Covid Vaxx To Cancer Explosion!

And why would a booster allow a cancer to come back? Well, it turned out it's very simple that boosters suppress the T-cell response. The first two will increase it a bit, but a booster suppresses it. And that's exactly what we found. But then a group from Madrid published a wonderful paper saying T-cell exhaustion after third COVID vaccine in cancer patients with an incredible data. Show it showed it very, very clearly. And so therefore any cancer suppressed and controlled by the immune system, you suspect might pop up after the booster. >> So, I want to remind people how we got the mRNA vaccine. It was never tested successfully and the vaccine they never had a successful coronavirus vaccine. Um and but they really, really wanted to push this mRNA vaccine. And this is from from the Milken Institute with Dr. Fauci and he's telling you how they're going to have to scare the hell out of people and make them more afraid of a coronavirus than they should be so then they can institute uh the the rollout of mRNA shots. I don't even call them vaccines. But let's listen, it's very short. >> Why don't we blow the system up? I mean, obviously we can't just turn off the spigot on the system we have and then say, "Hey, everyone in the world should get this new vaccine we've been giving to anyone yet." But there must be some way that we grow vaccines mostly in eggs the way we did in 1947. >> You know why? Because we've been proven that that that works and it's less toxic than an mRNA. So, he's saying, "Why can't we just force this?" He Do you hear him? "Why do we just force this on everybody? Why don't How do we got to get off the old vaccines that everybody's used to taking in their flu shot? We got to get something new on them." And here's what Fauci says. >> In order to make the transition from getting out of the tried and true egg growing, which we know gives us results that can be, you know, beneficial. I mean, we've done well with that, to something that has to be much better. Uh you have to prove that this works. And then you've got to go through all of the clinical trials, phase ones, phase twos, phase three, and then show that this particular product is going to be good over a period of years. >> Of Of Of course, they didn't do that with the mRNA vaccine. It was rushed through as called Warp Speed. Is there a better way to bring a medicine to market than at warp speed? And so, of course, they didn't do any of that, like he said. What did they do instead? >> That alone, if it works perfectly, is going to take a decade. >> They might >> Okay, so it didn't. They did it in 3 months. So, it did They didn't take a decade to study the vaccine. They just rushed it through, and here we go. >> a need or even an urgent call for an entity >> Right. >> of excitement out there that's completely disruptive, that's not beholden to bureaucratic strings and and and processes. >> So, >> You mean like a pandemic that's manufactured by this guy inventing a virus at the University of North Carolina, shipping it to Wuhan lab, and then having it get out accidentally get out and create a pandemic so we can have this new thing that is not uh subject to bureaucratic strings. Here's what he says about that. >> We really do have a problem of how the world perceives influenza, and it's going to be very difficult to change that unless you do it from within and say, I don't care what your perception is, we're going to address the problem in a disruptive way and in an iterative way because >> Which is exactly what they did with COVID. I don't care what If If not afraid of coronavirus, we're going to make you afraid of it, and we're going to do it in a disruptive way. Was there ever a bigger disruption in humanity than the lockdowns from COVID? I don't think so. And so, there he is telling you their plan, and that's just like a year before the the the pandemic. >> need both, but it is not too crazy to think that an outbreak of an novel avian virus could occur in in China somewhere. We could get the RNA sequence from that, beam it to a number of regional centers, if not local, if not even in your home at some point, and print those vaccines on a patch and self-administer. >> So, if that doesn't tell you exactly that they had this in mind and planned, they were talking about it in front of cameras with microphones. They were admitting their heinous evil plan. They're admitting it. That's what that is. And so, now we have doctors, the leading oncologists in the world, here's one of them, Dr. Professor Angus I can't pronounce his last name. How do you say his last name, Nick? >> Dalgleish. >> Dalgleish. So, he's [snorts] going to let you know that from his observational studies, he has drawing a connection between the mRNA vaccines and cancer. Now, let's watch. >> thing that people who've been stable with cancer melanoma for years started relapsing at the beginning of '22. And I asked for any reason why this might occurred, and I noticed they'd all been given boosters by their GPs, which I would if they'd asked me, I wouldn't have done that. And so, we had to look around. What's the reason? Why would a booster allow a cancer to come back? Well, it turned out it's very simple that boosters suppress the T-cell response. The first two will increase it a bit, but a booster suppresses it. And that's exactly what we found. But then a group from Madrid published a wonderful paper saying T-cell exhaustion after third COVID vaccine in cancer patients with an incredible data showing showed it very very clearly. And so therefore any cancer suppressed and controlled by the immune system, you suspect might pop up after the booster. Surgeons noted their colorectal patients were not were very difficult to treat. They were presenting late and they were presenting young. And they found that these patients had all had the booster, too. And they called you know, a red flag. And I called a red flag that just the suspicion that the the vaccine might be involved in the cancer. >> Are there any studies that have linked to the mRNA to cancer? Is there any sort of medical um um process that you can allude to that >> The strongest are the epidemiological studies. And uh the strongest was from Japan, a paper by Gibo and and his colleagues, which just had the raw data. And they noticed that the number of new cancer cases went up with each booster vaccine. >> So, again, this goes against the orthodoxy. And of course we now know that not only medical boards, but the the medical journals are completely corrupted by Big Pharma money and universities as well because they all relied on Dr. Fauci to fund their research and give them billions of dollars. And so now when a guy like this comes out and says this, they all attack him as he's some kind of a quack. But uh just what what's your reaction to when you hear this, Nick? >> Yeah, everything he says is 100% accurate. In fact, now over 70% of the global population was injected with a carcinogenic biological agent. And that biological agent is the mRNA gene transfer injections. We actually now have over 100 studies showing that the mRNA shots induce cancer or promote cancer by a 17 distinct mechanisms. He mentioned T-cell exhaustion was one of them. You also have turning off of tumor suppressor genes P53 and BRCA, hyperinflammation, overall immune dysregulation, um as well as just literally decimating uh multiple organ systems at the same time because it goes everywhere in the body. And you know, it's just a massive list. It's an absolutely massive list of mechanisms, but you know, the epidemiological data is undeniable. We have four major major data sets. And there's two in the United States. The first is the CDC Wonder mortality data. There's been 138,000 excess cancer deaths in the United States since the mRNA shots rolled out. Again, 138,000 more cancer deaths than normal. And then we had the SEER data set come out of the National Cancer Institute a few months ago. They found that multiple major cancers increased in young Americans right after the shots rolled out, including stomach cancer, colon cancer, brain tumors. They were up about 19%. Um so this should not be occurring. And then we had lastly Italian and South Korean studies totaling 8.7 million people combined comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated. And the vaccinated individuals suffered increased risks of seven major cancers, uh colon, prostate, breast, thyroid. Um all these cancers are up in the vaccinated. So, it's undeniable both mechanistically and at the population level. >> So, there's a chemical called SV40. Now, tell me about that and why has this been found inside the COVID vaccine? >> Yeah, SV40 is a portion of the DNA plasmid at the manufacturing process for the Pfizer mRNA injections. Basically, it's there to churn It's there in the DNA plasmid at the factory to churn out the mRNA, to help churn it out. The DNA plasmids are still in the vials. They don't clean them out. They say they do, but they don't. Over 10 studies have found these DNA plasmids, including SV40 segment of the plasmids in the vials. And so, when you inject it into people's arms, it's encased in the lipid nanoparticles. And we know SV40 is a cancer-promoting genetic material. And so, that's going to get into all of your bodily systems and promote cancer. And actually, it's possibly inserting itself into genomes, portions of this DNA plasmid. And we demonstrated that in a peer-reviewed study. We found a segment of this so-called vaccine genetic material fused in chromosome 19 in a stage four turbo bladder cancer patient. And so, you know, it's it's very bad. It's very, very bad. And that's another mechanism of promoting cancer is insertional mutagenesis or genomic integration of non-human synthetic vaccine DNA, um causing uncontrolled cell growth. >> And so, here's the South Korean study you were talking about. One year risk of cancers associated with COVID-19 vaccination, a large population-based cohort study in South Korea, and I'll just read you a couple of lines from this. Uh the uh oxygenetic potential of SARS-CoV-2 has been hypothetically proposed, but real-world data on the COVID-19 infection and vaccination are insufficient. Therefore, this large-scale population-based retrospective study in Seoul, South Korea aimed to estimate the cumulative incidences of subsequent risks of overall cancers 1 year after COVID-19 vaccination. Data from over 8 million individuals between '21 and '23 were obtained from the Korean National Health Insurance database. The participants were categorized into two groups based on their COVID-19 vaccination status. The risks for overall cancers were assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazard models. And data were expressed as hazard ratios with a 95% confidence uh uh interval. The thyroid cancer, gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, lung cancer, breast cancer, and prostate cancer significantly increased at a 1-year post-vaccination. So, I That's a gigantic study, 8 million people. And so, why do you Why do you think that today this is still happening? That they're still giving out free vac co- mRNA COVID vaccines at CVA. What is going I mean, is is our government just that eagle evil or they just that corrupt or both? >> It's both. It's both. And honestly, I don't have a good answers to why they're doing this. It It It's now at this point with all this evidence, it does qualify as a form of homicide. It may be mass negligent. Um we don't know yet. You know, that has to be um kind of rolled out. You know, what what sort of crime is being committed here now because we know it's causing these cancers. We know it's actually caused mass deaths, extreme blood clotting including white fibrous clots. A study came out on that 2 days ago. 25% of corpses have these long anomalous clots in them now. 75% of embalmers are finding them. Um and yeah, so it's criminal. We now we know the FDA literally covered up 25 safety signals in early 2021. Ron Johnson's team found that out with internal communications of between FDA officials. They literally buried a sudden cardiac death signal. It was killing people, children, teenagers, everybody. And they told the scientist that found those signals to cease and desist, right? So, that is a crime to hide uh death signals from a product you're telling millions of people to get. >> And so people have been attacking that professor. And so I asked Grok, please answer my question succinctly that that professor who's the the oncologist, the world-renowned oncologist who's correlating and connecting the the shots with cancer. And I said, please answer my question as succinctly as possible without adding commentary or qualifiers. The people attacking the professor, world-renowned oncologist, were wrong about most things to do with COVID in retrospect, like lockdown, school closures, vaccine stopping transmission and contraction, and social distancing, correct? Grok says, yes. So, there you go. The when you So, when you see someone like that on social media, and then you see him being attacked, remember the people attacking him were wrong about everything to do with COVID. You'll see You'll see posts You'll see posts like this. Uh he's a world-renowned grifting quack. >> [laughter] >> Right? That's what people say. They go uh and so uh I asked I asked Rock. I said, "Is Is this world-renowned oncologist uh really world-renowned? Is he a leader in the field who was well-respected before he spoke out on COVID?" Yes. He is a legitimate, well-respected oncologist with a strong pre-COVID reputation in his field. He's not fringe or unknown. And here's his credentials. He's got great, unbelievable credentials. He's held senior roles in oncology and immunology for decades. And he's discovered of CD4 as a major receptor for HIV. He pioneered work on cancer immunotherapy and vaccine. And he's contributed to the development of something I can't promo promote pronounce which led to him receiving the Joshua Lederberg Prize in 2011. Um I could go on and on. He's got a great reputation. And I said, "Well, is he a quack?" They go, "No, he's not a quack. He's credentialed in career. He's the founding chair of oncology at St. George's University of London since 1991. He's a fellow of respected bodies, the Academy of Medical Sciences, Royal Colleges. Extensive publication record, hundreds of papers he's published, strong citations in immunology and oncology, and contributions to HIV research and cancer immunotherapy. His uh pre-COVID standing, respected in his niche for tumor immunology, cancer vaccines, HIV. Colleagues viewed Colleagues viewed him as a productive clinic clinician scientist. So, of course, after he came out and went against the orthodoxy and told the truth about his findings with cancer and the jabs, now they're calling him a quack. That That's the We've seen this over and over. Not only Dr. McCollough, leader in his field, but anybody the guy who's what's his name who invented the mRNA vaccine technology. We've had him on the show. Dr. Robert Malone, right? Again, the guy who has vaccine patents, the guy who invented the mRNA vaccine platform that was based that that they used the covid shot based on they're not calling him a quack. So anybody who goes against Big Pharma's narrative, they're going to call a quack. I just wanted to show people that that one of the most leading oncologists in the world, they'll also try to dismiss. And what do you think it's going to take, Nick? What do you think it's going to take for regular people to realize that they were lied to about covid on a scale their brains cannot comprehend. >> It's going to take an injury or death in their family from one of these products, I think in the end, particularly for those who have received six, seven, eight, nine mRNA booster shots. While something bad may not have happened to them or somebody they know, the moment something does, that's when most people wake up and that's what I've seen. Now, but it's very sad for people who have taken six booster shots. An autopsy study recently came out and found basically their hearts look like a Swiss cheese under the microscope, not with holes, but with multiple micro scars. And so these shots literally cause little microscopic scars throughout the heart that lead to sudden death. >> Do you think we'll ever have a a person who's you know, what like when Walter Cronkite turned on the Vietnam War, that's what they said it was the end of the Do you think that there'll be someone who's respected in society that comes out and says something about this? That people will finally wake up. >> It's going I think it's going to have to come from the propaganda mainstream media outlets that these individuals religiously watch. It's going to have to come from CNN and all these other outlets, unfortunately. [snorts] And so, but they're captured by Big Pharma, by they're captured by Pfizer. And so, you know, it's going to be very difficult to get that to happen. Uh, but it needs to happen for the sake of public safety. You know, we have a an ongoing uh, long-term mass casualty event, right? We have to put an end to it somehow. >> Nicholas Holschur, uh, at the McCullough Foundation. I appreciate you uh, taking time to help explain all this to everybody. Uh, everybody should follow you on uh, X on Twitter @NickHolschur. And uh, thanks again for taking time for us, pal. >> Thank you. >> Okay. Hey, come see me on tour. We'll be in Burbank, California August 30th with the live celebrity panel show. And then September 18th through the 20th in Chicago, Illinois and Rosemont, Illinois. Go to jimmydore.com for a link for tickets. >> [music]

The Miracles of Lourdes: A Place Where Hope and Healing Meet

Nestled in the foothills of the French Pyrenees, the town of Lourdes has become one of the world's most visited pilgrimage destinations. Every year, millions of people travel there seeking healing, peace, and spiritual renewal. While many arrive carrying physical burdens, others come searching for hope after exhausting every other option.

The story of Lourdes began in 1858 with a humble 14-year-old girl named Bernadette Soubirous. Between February and July of that year, Bernadette reported experiencing eighteen apparitions of a beautiful lady in a grotto called Massabielle. During one of these encounters, the lady instructed Bernadette to dig in the ground. At first, only muddy water appeared, but soon a clear spring began flowing. That spring continues to flow today and has become one of the most recognized symbols of Lourdes.

Since that time, countless pilgrims have visited the spring, many believing they have experienced extraordinary physical and spiritual healings.

Although thousands of people have reported remarkable recoveries, the Catholic Church officially recognizes only a small number as miracles. Each recognized case undergoes years—sometimes decades—of medical review and documentation before receiving official recognition.

John Traynor: A Soldier Given Another Chance

One of the most famous Lourdes miracles is that of John Traynor, a British soldier who served during World War I.

During the war, Traynor suffered devastating injuries. He was struck by machine-gun fire, sustained severe head trauma, and was left partially paralyzed. He also developed epilepsy and chronic pain. Multiple surgeries failed to restore his health, and doctors believed his disabilities were permanent.

In 1923, Traynor traveled to Lourdes as part of a pilgrimage for sick veterans. He was brought to the baths and later participated in the Blessed Sacrament procession.

According to eyewitness accounts, he suddenly found strength returning to his body. He stood, walked, and experienced the complete disappearance of his chronic pain and paralysis. Even more remarkable, his epileptic seizures reportedly never returned.

His recovery was carefully documented and eventually recognized as one of Lourdes' most extraordinary miracles.

Anna Santaniello: Healing After Decades of Illness

Anna Santaniello of Italy spent much of her adult life battling severe heart disease.

She experienced repeated episodes of breathlessness, swelling, weakness, and heart failure. Her condition progressively worsened despite years of treatment, leaving her unable to live a normalcy life.

In 1952, at the age of 41, she made a pilgrimage to Lourdes.

After bathing in the Lourdes waters, Anna reported feeling an immediate and overwhelming sense of strength. The symptoms that had plagued her for years disappeared. Doctors who followed her case found that the improvements remained permanent.

After decades of observation and medical review, her healing was officially recognized by the Church as a miracle in 2005.

Sister Bernadette Moriau: Freedom After Nearly Forty Years of Pain

French nun Sister Bernadette Moriau suffered from severe spinal nerve damage that caused intense, constant pain. She required braces, powerful medications, and could walk only with great difficulty.

Her condition lasted for almost four decades.

During a pilgrimage to Lourdes in 2008, she attended a blessing for the sick. Later that evening, she experienced what she described as a profound interior peace.

The next morning, she found she could stand and walk without assistance. She immediately stopped using her braces and medications. Medical examinations over the following years found no explanation for the lasting recovery.

In 2018, her healing became the 70th officially recognized miracle of Lourdes.

The Enduring Legacy of Lourdes

Since Bernadette first uncovered the spring in 1858, more than 200 million pilgrims have visited Lourdes. Thousands have reported healings of body, mind, or spirit.

Many visitors leave without experiencing a dramatic physical cure, yet they often describe finding something equally meaningful: renewed faith, inner peace, forgiveness, and hope.

For believers around the world, Lourdes represents far more than a place of reported miracles. It is a reminder that compassion, prayer, and hope continue to inspire millions of people more than 160 years after a young girl first knelt beside a small spring in a quiet French grotto.

Whether one visits seeking healing, answers, or simply peace, Lourdes remains one of history's most remarkable places of pilgrimage—a place where stories of faith and healing continue to be shared generation after generation.